Institutional Bidding in Ipo Allocation: Evidence from China
نویسندگان
چکیده
Using a proprietary database of institutional investor bidding for shares in Chinese IPO allocations, we examine the information content and predictive ability of bidding dispersion. IPOs with higher levels of bid dispersion experience greater first-day return than other IPOs by discounting the offer price as a compensation for investors’ bearing valuation uncertainty and estimation risk, as well as greater trading volume and price volatility. Our results hold after controlling for potential endogeneity and using alternative dispersion measures. Dispersion of bidding prices is negatively predictive both of one-year operating performance post-IPO and three-month stock performance. Bid characteristics, such as the timing of the bid and the frequency and the type of the bidder, matter in the pricing of IPOs, as does the geographic distance between bidders and the IPO firm. Using a 2010 regulation change in the IPO share allocation rule as a natural experiment, we show that the new rule decreases dispersion among institutional bidders but increases the effect of dispersion on first-day return. The evidence highlights the role of institutions and regulatory policies on IPOs in China.
منابع مشابه
A Study on the Collusive Behavior in Book Building Mechanism, Institutional Investors’ Bidding Behavior and IPO Performance
Based on the Chinese IPO book building mechanism as the background, the paper chooses the market-oriented period (from November,2010 to April,2012) of the IPOs as the samples, and studies the relationship between the collusive behavior, institutional investors’ bidding behavior and underwriters’ pricing strategy(as well as the post-IPO performance). The results show that: Firstly, in the case o...
متن کاملWhy Have Auctions Been Losing Market Shares to Bookbuilding in IPO Markets?
This paper analyzes bidding data of IPO auctions held in Taiwan to address three questions. First, several studies on bookbuilding IPOs have shown that allocation policies favor institutional investors. Would auctions be a fairer mechanism to retail investors? Second, Sherman (2002) argues that bookbuilding has an edge over auctions in IPO pricing. What empirical evidence can be offered to sugg...
متن کاملAnchor Investors in IPOs
Anchor Investors in IPOs In July 2009, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) permitted a version of bookbuilding in which IPO managers solicit bids from and allocate allocations to anchor investors in the IPO pre-market, subject to disclosure of the price, quantity, and identity of anchors participating in the pre-market bookbuilding. We obtain share allocation data in anchor IPOs. ...
متن کاملInstitutional Allocation in Initial Public Offerings: Empirical Evidence
We analyze institutional allocation in initial public offerings (IPOs) using a new dataset of US offerings between 1997 and 1998. We document a positive relation between institutional allocation and day 1 IPO returns: for instance, institutions get under 60% of overpriced issues but about 75% of underpriced issues. The positive relation is partly explained by the practice of giving institutions...
متن کاملEconomic freedom and IPO underpricing
This paper examines how the difference in institutional environments constitutes differential IPO underpricing across countries. Using the Heritage Foundation’s Index of Economic Freedom (IEF) as a proxy for the heterogeneous institutional environment, and a sample of 3728 IPOs from 22 countries and regions over the period 1993–2014, we find that countries with higher economic freedom have sign...
متن کامل